linux-kernel - Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb9epf$dse$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:34:48 +0200
From:	Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16

Hello,

could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? 
There have been some bugs:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757

and maybe there are more of them. I would like to stay on the 2.6.16 
branch as I don't like to update my kernel several times a week. I just 
want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.

Thank you very much in advance

Yours

Manuel Reimer

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/