[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060809063947.GA13474@goober>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 23:39:49 -0700
From: Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>,
David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...tin.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Akkana Peck <akkana@...llowsky.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>, jsipek@...sunysb.edu,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 09:01:47PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 04:28:29PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> > you can work around mutt's silly dependancy on atime by configuring it
> > with --enable-buffy-size. so far mutt is the only program i've discovered
> > which cares about atime.
>
> For the shell, atime is the difference between 'you have mail' and 'you
> have new mail'.
>
> I still don't understand though, how much does this really buy us over
> nodiratime?
Lazy atime buys us a reduction in writes over nodiratime for any
workload which reads files, such as grep -r, a kernel compile, or
backup software. Do I misunderstand the question?
-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists