linux-kernel - Re: [take6 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060809080754.GA29783@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:07:57 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, zach.brown@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [take6 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:58:56AM -0700, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:02:39 +0400
> 
> Evgeniy, it's things like the following that make it very draining
> mentally to review your work.
> 
> >  * removed AIO stuff from patchset
> 
> You didn't really do this, you leave the aio_* syscalls and stubs in
> there, and you also left things like tcp_async_send() in there.

By AIO I meant VFS AIO, not network stuff, exactly that part was frown 
upon in reviews.

> All the foo_naio_*() stuff is still in there to.
> 
> Please remove all of async business we've asked you to.

So you want to review kevent core only at the first point and postpone
network AIO and the rest implementation after core is correct.
Should I remove poll/timer notifications too?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/