[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060809094813.GE3308@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:48:13 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>
Cc: David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>,
"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@....de>,
reiserfs-list@...esys.com, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>,
Clay Barnes <clay.barnes@...il.com>,
Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl>,
Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>, ipso@...ppymail.ca,
lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
On Wed 2006-08-09 02:37:45, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Yes, I'm afraid redundancy/checksums kill write speed,
> >
> they kill write speed to cache, but not to disk.... our compression
> plugin is faster than the uncompressed plugin.....
Yes, you can get clever. But your compression plugin also means that
single bit error means whole block is lost, so there _is_ speed
vs. stability-against-hw-problems.
But you are right that compression will catch same class of errors
checksums will, so that it is probably good thing w.r.t. stability.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists