| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608091352440.23404@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:53:31 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com> cc: Edward Shishkin <edward@...esys.com>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>, ric@....com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>, "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>, bernd-schubert@....de, reiserfs-list@...esys.com, jbglaw@...-owl.de, clay.barnes@...il.com, rudy@...ons.demon.nl, ipso@...ppymail.ca, lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion >> Yes, it looks like a business of node plugin, but AFAIK, you >> objected against such checks: > >Did I really? Well, I think that allowing users to choose whether to >checksum or not is a reasonable thing to allow them. I personally would >skip the checksum on my computer, but others.... > >It could be a useful mkfs option.... It should preferably a runtime tunable variable, at best even per-superblock and (overriding the sb setting), per-file. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists