[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44D93B60.7030507@google.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:33:20 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> How much of this is just building special case support for large allocations
> for jumbo frames? Wouldn't it make more sense to just fix those drivers to
> do scatter and add the support hooks for that?
Short answer: none of it is. If it happens to handle jumbo frames nicely
that is mainly a lucky accident, and we do need to check that they actually
works.
Minor rant: the whole skb_alloc familly has degenerated into an unholy
mess and could use some rethinking. I believe the current patch gets as
far as three _'s at the beginning of a function, this shows it is high
time to reroll the api.
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists