[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26750.1155129364@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:16:04 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Kprobes: Define retval helper
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > Good idea. You should add parentheses around regs, otherwise the C
> > > preprocessor might bite users. Also the shouting name is quite ugly.
> > > In fact it should probably go to asm/system.h or similar and not have
> > > a kprobes name - it just extracts the return value from a struct pt_regs
> > > after all.
> >
> > Done! How does this look? I added it to asm/ptrace.h so it lives along
> > with the instruction_pointer() definition.
I presume we don't care about return values that span multiple registers - for
instance if you return a 64-bit value on i386 it'll wind up in EDX:EAX.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists