linux-kernel - Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:52:33 -0400
From:	David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
To:	Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@....de>,
	reiserfs-list@...esys.com, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>,
	Clay Barnes <clay.barnes@...il.com>,
	Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl>,
	Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>, ipso@...ppymail.ca,
	lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
 regarding reiser4 inclusion

Hans Reiser wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
>>
>> Yes, I'm afraid redundancy/checksums kill write speed,
>>
> they kill write speed to cache, but not to disk....  our compression
> plugin is faster than the uncompressed plugin.....

Regarding cache, do we do any sort of consistency checking for RAM, or 
do we leave that to some of the stranger kernel patches -- or just an 
occasional memtest?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/