[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060809161039.GA30856@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:10:39 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Kprobes: Make kprobe modules more portable
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:01:45AM -0500, David Smith wrote:
> > + if (p->symbol_name) {
> > + if (p->addr)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + p->addr = kprobe_lookup_name(p->symbol_name) + p->offset;
> > + }
>
> What if kprobe_lookup_name() fails
for that case we need the check in your snipplet below.
> or if CONFIG_KALLSYMS isn't set?
I think we should just disallow that case. having kprobes without kallsyms
is rather pointless. I'll send a patch to add the dependency to the Kconfig
files.
> Perhaps this needs something like:
>
> if (p->symbol_name) {
> if (p->addr)
> return -EINVAL;
> p->addr = kprobe_lookup_name(p->symbol_name) + p->offset;
> if (p->addr == p->offset)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists