[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44D94142.3050703@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:58:26 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] NUMA futex hashing
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>> Of course we would need a new syscall, and to change glibc to be able to
>> actually use this new private_futex syscall.
>
>
> No, why? The kernel already does recognize private mutexes. It just
> checks whether the pages used to store it are private or mapped. This
> requires some interaction with the memory subsystem but as long as no
> crashes happen the data can change underneath. It's the program's
> fault if it does.
Because that requires taking mmap_sem. Avoiding that is the whole
purpose, isn't it?
--
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists