[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060809173830.GA10930@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:38:30 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>,
Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvz.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: + sys_getppid-oopses-on-debug-kernel.patch added to -mm tree
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:12:49PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > > >>Even without getting into just how ugly this is, is it really worth
> > > >>it?
> > > it is impossible to run debug kernels w/o this patch :/
> > > or are you asking whether this optimization worth it?
> > >
> > > What makes me worry is that this is a sign that vendors
> > > don't even bother to run debug kernels :((((
> >
> > Fedora rawhide is nearly always shipping with DEBUG_SLAB enabled,
> > and we didn't hit this once. Are you sure this is a problem
> > with DEBUG_SLAB, and not DEBUG_PAGEALLOC ?
> Sorry, it's my fault. Surely, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
Then you're correct, vendors rarely turn this on :)
I do sometimes if I'm trying to chase down something particularly
difficult, and it usually gets me a bunch of mail from users
asking why 'everything got all slow', so it's a last-resort option
rather than a 'on all the time' option.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists