lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1155145440.5418.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:44:00 -0700
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc4 (and earlier): CMOS clock corruption during suspend
	to disk on i386

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 14:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It looks like the CMOS clock gets corrupted during the suspend to disk
> on i386.  I've observed this on 2 different boxes.  Moreover, one of them is
> AMD64-based and the x86_64 kernel doesn't have this problem on it.
> 
> Also, I've done some tests that indicate the corruption doesn't occur before
> saving the suspend image.  It rather happens when the box is powered off
> or rebooted (tested both cases).

Hmmm. Could you better describe the corruption you're seeing? 

I've just gotten a report about uptime reporting odd values after resume
when the CMOS clock was set to the past during a suspend to disk, but
that's somewhat expected and I would think it would occur on x86_64 as
well.

thanks
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ