linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: mark two more functions as _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:14:17 +0900
From:	"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	"Magnus Damm" <magnus@...inux.co.jp>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: mark two more functions as __init

On 8/9/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> On Tue,  8 Aug 2006 17:17:00 +0900 (JST)
> Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > i386: mark two more functions as __init
> >
> > cyrix_identify() should be __init because transmeta_identify() is.
> > tsc_init() is only called from setup_arch() which is marked as __init.
> >
> > These two section mismatches have been detected using running modpost on
> > a vmlinux image compiled with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y.
> >
> > -static void cyrix_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c)
> > +static void __init cyrix_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c)
>
> Are we sure?  We end up putting a pointer to this into
> arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c:cpu_devs[], and that gets used from __cpuinit
> code.

Uh, right. The problem is that almost all cpu code is put in the
__init section today. I'll break out and resend the tsc code, and on
top of that post a set of patches that puts cpu code and data into
__cpuinit and __cpuinitdata sections.

Thanks!

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/