[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73lkpyobag.fsf@verdi.suse.de>
Date: 09 Aug 2006 05:09:11 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
haveblue@...ibm.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru> writes:
[adding linux-arch]
> > Accessing freed memory is a bug, always, not just *only* when slab
> > debugging is on, right? Doesn't this mean we could get junk, or that
> > the reader could potentially run off a bad pointer?
> no, read the comment in sys_getppid.
> It is a valid optimization. _safe_ and alowing to bypass taking the lock.
> BUT! This optimization relies on the fact that kernel memory (DMA + normal zone)
> is always mapped into virtual address space.
> Which is invalid for debug kernels only.
In x86 arch code we would use __get_user for this (and we do in a couple
of places). But it wouldn't be portable because sometimes _user is
in a different address space.
Maybe it would be time to make a similar facility (read/write_kernel_safe() or similar)
with error return available to generic code?
It should be easy to implement - iirc near all architectures already
use the exception handling frame work and it is a simple extension
of that. x86 could just define it to __put/get_user
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists