[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060808.225355.78711315.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: johnpol@....mipt.ru
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
phillips@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:46:48 +0400
> There is another approach for that - do not use slab allocator for
> network dataflow at all. It automatically has all you pros amd if
> implemented correctly can have a lot of additional usefull and
> high-performance features like full zero-copy and total fragmentation
> avoidance.
Free advertisement for your network tree allocator Evgeniy? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists