[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060809055530.GE17446@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:55:31 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
phillips@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:53:55PM -0700, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:46:48 +0400
>
> > There is another approach for that - do not use slab allocator for
> > network dataflow at all. It automatically has all you pros amd if
> > implemented correctly can have a lot of additional usefull and
> > high-performance features like full zero-copy and total fragmentation
> > avoidance.
>
> Free advertisement for your network tree allocator Evgeniy? :-)
He-he, some kind of :)
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists