[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44D980EB.5010608@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:30:03 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: phillips@...gle.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] 3c59x driver conversion
David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:51:20 -0700
>
>> Elaborate please. Do you think that all drivers should be updated to
>> fix the broken blockdev semantics, making NETIF_F_MEMALLOC redundant?
>> If so, I trust you will help audit for it?
>
> I think he's saying that he doesn't think your code is yet a
> reasonable way to solve the problem, and therefore doesn't belong
> upstream.
Pretty much. It is completely non-sensical to add NETIF_F_MEMALLOC,
when it should be blindingly obvious that every net driver will be
allocating memory, and every net driver could potentially be used with
NBD and similar situations.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists