[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1155948543.2924.101.camel@mindpipe>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:49:03 -0400
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@...aki.hu>,
Mattia Dongili <malattia@...ux.it>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 + hotfix -- Many processes use the sysctl
system call
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 02:40 +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:30:37AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > > "fixed"? Why is sysctl being removed in the middle of a stable kernel
> > > series?!?
> >
> > IMHO the stable series is 2.6.x.y nowadays. 2.6.z (without a fourth
> > number) is more or less what used to be 2.<odd> previously.
> Not to mention we're dealing with a -mm kernel...
>
Ah, OK - the debian-glibc thread the OP referred to began:
"Starting with 2.6.18, the official kernels do not have the sysctl
syscall anymore (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/15/54) or rather it has
been replaced by a dummy syscall that always fail and print a message
in the log, and thus the sysctl() function will not work anymore."
However the referenced link is about an -mm kernel.
Sorry for the noise.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists