[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44E7BB7F.7030204@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:31:43 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, akpm@...l.org,
James K Lewis <jklewis@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] HOWTO use NAPI to reduce TX interrupts
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 01:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Someone should probably document that in
>> Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt, I might end up doing that
>> once we get it right for spidernet
>>
The reason reclaim via poll() is efficient is because it avoid causing a
softirq that is
necessary when skb_free_irq() is done. Instead it reuses the softirq
from the poll()
routine. Like all Rx NAPI, using poll() for reclaim means:
+ aggregating multiple frames in one irq
- increased overhead of twiddling with the IRQ mask
- more ways to get driver stuck
Some drivers do all their irq work in the poll() routine (including PHY
handling).
This is good if reading the IRQ status does an auto mask operation.
The whole NAPI documentation area is a mess and needs a good writer
to do some major restructuring. It should also be split into reference
information,
tutorial and guide sections.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists