| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060819044533.GB24543@1wt.eu> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:45:33 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@...dv.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1 On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Can you send me the .config's you are using for 2.4 and 2.6 > > > (preferably for kernel.org kernels)? > > > > > > > I can send you only the current 2.4 config I use (not exactly vanilla). > > Thanks, but it didn't help me much since it needed some work getting it > compiling with uClinux-2.4.31-uc0, and the next step of creating a > functionally equivalent 2.6 kernel doesn't seem to be reasonably > possible. In his case, it is a very valid reason to stay on 2.4 right now, which was the original question IIRC. > My aim is to compare the size of the compiled objects for finding what > causes size regressions in 2.6 compared to 2.4. Sometimes it will be compilers, but not by that much. Gcc3.[34] generally produce bigger code than 2.95 at -O2, but I don't think that people in the embedded world still use 2.95 much. Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists