[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1155968305.1388.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:18:24 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Thomas Klein <osstklei@...ibm.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.19 PATCH 4/7] ehea: ethtool interface
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:41 +0200, Thomas Klein wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> first of all thanks a lot for the extensive review.
>
>
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> + u64 hret = H_HARDWARE;
> >
> > Useless assignment here and everywhere.
> >
>
> Initializing returncodes to errorstate is a cheap way to prevent
> accidentally returning (uninitalized) success returncodes which
> can lead to catastrophic misbehaviour.
If you try to return an uninitialized value the compiler will warn you,
you'll then look at the code and realise you missed a case, you might
save yourself a bug. By unconditionally initialising you are lying to
the compiler, and it can no longer help you.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (192 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists