[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1psexum92.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:07:37 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:05:27 -0600
> "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> By not rolling our own inode we get a little more code reuse,
>> and things get a little simpler and we don't have special
>> cases to contend with later.
>
> On a standard FC5 install (which has selinux enabled) things get very ugly.
>
> udev: MAKEDEV: mkdir: file exists
>
> followed by a stream of udev errors of various sorts and then an infinite
> loop of auditd complaints about klogd and "/" and tmpfs. Nothing makes it
> to logs because klogd itself is failing.
I'm not feeling very generous today. I'm wondering what selinux bug
I have found now. Without selinux everything is fine on FC5.
Any chance of a search through that patchset to see which patch selinux
trips on?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists