[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acd2a5930608190432l17c4afebqcc5a941c8e81ebb5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:32:16 +0400
From: "Vitaly Wool" <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: "Vitaly Wool" <vitalywool@...il.com>, jean-paul.saman@...lips.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] UART driver for PNX8550/8950 revised
On 8/19/06, Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >This comment's not correct - where is the break condition disabled?
> > >I thought it might be in the next serial_out() but it seems to be
> > >missing from there as well?
> >
> > I don't think you're right here - break condition is also disabled
> > unsetting the corresponding bit in IEN register for this particular
> > UART.
>
> Hmm, in that case why does break_ctl do this:
>
> + lcr = serial_in(sport, PNX8XXX_LCR);
> + if (break_state == -1)
> + lcr |= PNX8XXX_UART_LCR_TXBREAK;
> + else
> + lcr &= ~PNX8XXX_UART_LCR_TXBREAK;
> + serial_out(sport, PNX8XXX_LCR, lcr);
>
> which appears to imply that the bit for the break state is in the LCR.
> Moreover, there isn't a PNX8XXX_INT_* bit defined for break. Confused.
Yeah, looking more attentively into docs, I must admit that you're
right here, and I'm wrong.
Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists