linux-kernel - Re: Linux time code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608201910480.6761@scrub.home>
Date:	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:14:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@...uni-regensburg.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: Linux time code

Hi,

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, john stultz wrote:

> > Hm, I guess that's ok for most of the timestamp applications I'm aware of 
> > as long as NTP won't cause the clock to stand still...
> 
> Nope. Its limited to a +/-500ppm adjustment max.

This is only frequency adjustment, time adjustment is added as well which 
can be much larger than this.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/