[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1156099979.4051.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:52:59 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
Alex Riesen <fork0@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
Ar Sul, 2006-08-20 am 20:21 +0200, ysgrifennodd Willy Tarreau:
> Arjan proposed to add a __must_check on the set*uid() function in glibc.
> I think that if killing the program is what makes you nervous, we could
> at least print a warning in the kernel logs so that the admin of a machine
> being abused has a chance to detect what's going on. Would you accept
> something like this ?
That ratelimited doesn't sound unreasonable - you want to know its
happening whatever the cause. You could do it with the kernel or with
the audit daemon I guess.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists