linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1156106442.23756.71.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:40:41 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
Cc:	Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace
	__KERNEL_SYSCALLS__

On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:36 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2006.08.20 22:20:28 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:11 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > On 2006.08.20 21:50:46 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > \
> > > > > Could we rename __syscall_return to IS_SYS_ERR (or whatever) and force
> > > > > kernel syscall users to do the check? That way we could eliminate errno
> > > > 
> > > > s/users/user/ .. there's one left that should die out soon ;)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Only one in unistd.h, but throughout the kernel there are quite a few
> > > unless I'm missing something here:
> > > doener@...ola:~/src/kernel/linux-2.6$ grep \ _syscall * -R | \
> > > > grep -v define\\\|undef\\\|clobber | wc -l
> > > 116
> > > 
> > > Are these just going to be replaced by calls to sys_whatever?
> > 
> > they're not the users of this, they're the definitions... ;)
> 
> Well, I assume that if some code defines a syscall, it will actually use
> it. Of course I meant to ask if the users of those definitions are going
> to just call sys_whatever.
> For example check_host_supports_tls in arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/tls.c
> which even uses the global errno (although in that case the whole
> else part could probably be just removed).

um uses glibc, and is thus special.. lets ignore that ;)
(really, it's an entire different beast in this regard)

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/