[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060820225823.GD602@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:58:23 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:11:08AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-08-21 am 02:34 +0400, ysgrifennodd Solar Designer:
> > Do you really think that getting this fix into 2.4 should be delayed
> > like that?
>
> I have no problem with it going into 2.4. Someone should forward port it
> - but there should be plenty of people on the lists to do that.
That's so true ! We're relying too much on our own time while many people
might be waiting for some little work to start taking a look at the kernel
internals !
I think I will be starting to ask for forward porters for the fixed to 2.4
that need to be ported to 2.6 too.
Cheers,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists