linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:21:48 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check

Hi Alexander,

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:46:29AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Willy,
> 
> I propose the attached patch (extracted from 2.4.33-ow1) for inclusion
> into 2.4.34-pre.  (Last time I checked, 2.6 needed an equivalent fix,
> but I haven't produced one yet.)
> 
> Basically, the code in drivers/block/loop.c did not check the return
> value from kernel_thread().  If kernel_thread() would fail, the code
> would misbehave (IIRC, the invoking process would become unkillable).
> 
> An easy way to trigger the bug was to run losetup under strace (as
> root), and this is also how I tested the error path added with this
> patch.

That's amazing it never got fixed before !
I still remembered this problem being discussed, and finally found
the thread :

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/11/14/55

In fact, no code was proposed and 2.6 got fixed later, then stopped
using kernel_thread() so nearly nobody might have noticed it :

  http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=3e88c17d404c5787afd5bd1763380317f5ccbf84;hp=22e6c1b39c648850438decd491f62d311800c7db

> This change has been a part of publicly released -ow patches for 8+
> months.
> 
> There are more instances of kernel_thread() calls that do not check the
> return value; some of the remaining ones might need to be fixed, too.

I've read somewhere that the module loading code might be affected too.

> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander

Thanks for this patch, I know this problem caught me at least one !

Cheers,
Willy


> diff -urpPX nopatch linux-2.4.33/drivers/block/loop.c linux/drivers/block/loop.c
> --- linux-2.4.33/drivers/block/loop.c	Fri Jun  3 04:26:42 2005
> +++ linux/drivers/block/loop.c	Sat Aug 12 08:51:47 2006
> @@ -693,12 +693,23 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
>  	set_blocksize(dev, bs);
>  
>  	lo->lo_bh = lo->lo_bhtail = NULL;
> -	kernel_thread(loop_thread, lo, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND);
> -	down(&lo->lo_sem);
> +	error = kernel_thread(loop_thread, lo,
> +	    CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND);
> +	if (error < 0)
> +		goto out_clr;
> +	down(&lo->lo_sem); /* wait for the thread to start */
>  
>  	fput(file);
>  	return 0;
>  
> + out_clr:
> +	lo->lo_backing_file = NULL;
> +	lo->lo_device = 0;
> +	lo->lo_flags = 0;
> +	loop_sizes[lo->lo_number] = 0;
> +	inode->i_mapping->gfp_mask = lo->old_gfp_mask;
> +	lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
> +	fput(file); /* yes, have to do it twice */
>   out_putf:
>  	fput(file);
>   out:

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/