[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060820160852.GA2186@oleg>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:08:52 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix? current_io_context() vs set_task_ioprio() race
I know nothing about io scheduler, but I suspect set_task_ioprio() is not safe.
current_io_context() initializes "struct io_context", then sets ->io_context.
set_task_ioprio() running on another cpu may see the changes out of order, so
->set_ioprio(ioc) may use io_context which was not initialized properly.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 2.6.18-rc4/block/ll_rw_blk.c~3_race 2006-07-16 01:53:08.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2006-08-20 19:30:10.000000000 +0400
@@ -3628,6 +3628,8 @@ struct io_context *current_io_context(gf
ret->nr_batch_requests = 0; /* because this is 0 */
ret->aic = NULL;
ret->cic_root.rb_node = NULL;
+ /* make sure set_task_ioprio() sees the settings above */
+ smp_wmb();
tsk->io_context = ret;
}
--- 2.6.18-rc4/fs/ioprio.c~3_race 2006-08-20 19:09:08.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/fs/ioprio.c 2006-08-20 19:57:14.000000000 +0400
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ static int set_task_ioprio(struct task_s
task->ioprio = ioprio;
ioc = task->io_context;
+ /* see wmb() in current_io_context() */
+ smp_read_barrier_depends();
+
if (ioc && ioc->set_ioprio)
ioc->set_ioprio(ioc, ioprio);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists