[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060821.003317.63131005.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:33:17 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: zippel@...ux-m68k.org
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:01:51 +0200, zippel@...ux-m68k.org wrote:
> This folds update_ntp_one_tick() into second_overflow() and adds
> time_adjust to the tick length, this makes time_next_adjust unnecessary.
> This slightly changes the adjtime() behaviour, instead of applying it to
> the next tick, it's applied to the next second.
...
> -/* Don't completely fail for HZ > 500. */
> -int tickadj = 500/HZ ? : 1; /* microsecs */
The tickadj is used by cris, frv, m32r, m68k, mips and sparc. This
patch would break build on those platforms.
I have not looked at this patch closely yet. Just a report.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists