[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608211220450.16712@skynet.skynet.ie>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:22:42 +0100 (IST)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mm patch] drm, minor fixes
>>
>> are you sure the callers of these don't wrap it inside a DRM_ERR()
>> macro ?
> I changed the values when:
> - I've checked what seemed right, getting back to the system call.
> drm_ioctl(), through a call to func().
> That's the case for:
> - the EFAULT value in i915_emit_box
> - two EINVAL values in drm_setversion
> - the return value wasn't used. That was the case for
> drm_set_busid return values, I felt having returned values negative
> from the start was more consistent.
>
> Is there a particular change that looked suspicious to you?
These are all actual bugs , however I doubt any of the codepaths are
causing a major problem, a lot of those code paths are for older X
systems or not very likely hit, I'll pull the fixes into the DRM tree
now... the i915 one is a worry I must give out the TG/Intel folks :-)
Thanks,
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists