[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44E99904.80205@sw.ru>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:29:08 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: rohitseth@...gle.com
CC: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
hugh@...itas.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
>>in case of anon_vma, page->mapping can be the same
>>for 2 pages beloning to different containers.
>>
>
>
> In your experience, have you seen processes belonging to different
> containers sharing the same anon_vma? On a more general note, could you
> please point me to a place that has the list of requirements for which
> we are designing this solution.
>
>
>>>>nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict,
>>>>and very straightforward.
>>>
>>>What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have
>>>the required information.
>>
>>inodes can belong to multiple containers and so do the pages.
>>
>
>
> I'm still thinking that inodes should belong to one container (or may be
> have it configurable based on some flag).
this is not true for OpenVZ nor Linux-VServer.
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists