linux-kernel - Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608211704.03061.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:04:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	vgoyal@...ibm.com
Cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp>, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.

On Monday 21 August 2006 16:46, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:24:10PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > > Given the idea of relocatable kernel is floating around I would prefer if
> > > we are not bounded by the restriction of loading a kernel in lowest 4G.
> > 
> > There is already other code that requires this. In fact i don't think it can
> > be above 40MB currently.
> >
> 
> But I think Eric's prototype patches for relocatable kernel do get over
> this limitation (Hope I understood the code right). Assuming that relocatable
> kernel patches will be merged down the line, it would be nice not to be
> bound by 4G limitation.

He may have fixed the 40MB issue, but I very much doubt he changed the 2GB
limitation because that would be a major change.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/