[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m13bbpu7i5.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:02:58 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp>
Cc: fastboot@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.
Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp> writes:
> x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.
>
> The current x86_64 startup code never reloads CS during the early boot process
> if the 64-bit function startup_64 is used as entry point. The 32-bit entry
> point startup_32 does the right thing and reloads CS, and this is what most
> people are using if they use bzImage.
>
> This patch fixes the case when the Linux kernel is booted into using kexec
> under Xen. The Xen hypervisor is using large CS values which makes the x86_64
> kernel fail - but only if vmlinux is booted, bzImage works well because it
> is using the 32-bit entry point.
>
> The main question is if we require that the boot loader should setup CS
> to some certain offset to be able to boot the kernel. The sane solution IMO
> should be that the kernel requires that the loaded descriptors are correct,
> but that the exact offset within the GDT the boot loader is using should not
> matter. This is the way the i386 boot works if I understand things correctly.
What extra reload of cs does Xen introduce?
I'm not really comfortable with a half virtualized case.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists