[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060822203954.9ca154cb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:39:54 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, pj@....com,
saito.tadashi@...t.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ps command race fix take2 [4/4] proc_pid_readdir
On 22 Aug 2006 13:11:30 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>
> > proc_pid_readdir() by list_token.
> >
> > Remember 'where we are reading' by inserting a token in the list.
> > It seems a bit complicated because of RCU but what we do is very simple.
> >
>
> What happens when you have multiple readers at the same time? Can't
> the tokens then be mixed up?
>
multiple readers will insert their own token to a list. And list_next_rcu_skiptoken()
skips all token (not-data). it's used by next_task().
> >+ /* this small kmalloc() can fail in rare case, but readdir()
> >+ * is not allowed to return ENOMEM. retrying is reasonable. */
>
> Who disallows this? Such retry loops are normally discouraged
> because they can lead to deadlocks in OOM situations.
> I think it would be better to just return ENOMEM.
>
Hmm, to be honest, not disallowed. but not allowed. The apps don't expect
readdir(3) failed with -ENOMEM.
But yes, ps command or ls /proc may be caught in the kernel for some time.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists