[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060822140832.GW11651@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:08:32 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:56:03AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>relicensing them.
> >>
> >
> >That's a pretty strong statement...
> >
>
> Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement. I'm just pointing out
> that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional
> change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops). Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops
> is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive.
It only affects kernels with the new functionality PARAVIRT=y, not
kernels with the same functionality as today.
The alternative is to keep the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) and make
the functions using it out of line functions.
> J
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists