linux-kernel - Re: mplayer + heavy io: why ionice doesn't help?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608221826.08802.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:26:08 +0200
From:	Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net>,
	mplayer-users@...ayerhq.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mplayer + heavy io: why ionice doesn't help?

> > I eliminated skips due to CPU and disk using
> > nice and -cache 8000. I still can make it skip
> > when my KDE background picture is changing.
> > 
> 
> I also must run mplayer at nice -20 for it to be usable.
> 
> > I think that these skips are caused by the X server.
> > It has no prioritization for request handling and
> > thus it does not paint mplayer output fast enough:
> > it needs to repaint background and semi-transparent
> > konsole(s), and that is taking a few seconds at least.
> > 
> > This is probably aggravated by serializing nature of Xlib,
> > according to:
> > 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLib
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XCB
> 
> I think the problem is also due to mplayer's faulty design.  It should
> be multithreaded and use RT threads for the time sensitive work, like
> all professional AV applications and many other consumer players do.

RT - yes, multithreaded - unsure. Witness how squid manages to
serve hundreds of simultaneous streams using just a single process.

Multithreading seems cool on the first glance and it is easier to code
than clever O_NONBLOCK/select/poll/etc stuff. However,
on single-CPU boxes, which are still a majority, multithreading
just incurs context switching penalty. It cannot magically
make CPU do more work in a unit of time.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/