linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:42:33 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's?

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:07:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I didn't find a corresponding open bug in the gcc Bugzilla.
> 
> Can someone verify whether it's still present, and if yes, open a gcc 
> bug?

Yup, it's easy enough to check.

> It's set globally in arch/i386/Makefile:
>   cflags-$(CONFIG_REGPARM) += -mregparm=3

IIRC, there used to be functions explicitly declared as __regparam or
something, and that's what I was grepping for.  Does this turn every
function with three or fewer parameters into a regparam function?

> That's not pulled by UML, but if there are no outstanding problems with 
> regparm, we could both enable it uncomditionally on i386 and enable it
> on UML/i386.

That shouldn't be a problem.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/