linux-kernel - Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1156276823.2476.22.camel@entropy>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:00:23 -0700
From:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com, akpm@...l.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, zach.brown@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:59 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> 
> > In this brave new world of always stable kernel development, the time a
> > new interface has for public testing before a new kernel release is
> > drastically shorter than the old unstable development series, and if
> > nobody is documenting how this stuff is supposed to work and
> > demonstrating how it will be used, then mistakes are bound to slip
> > through.
> 
> Feel free to provide the documentation.  Perhaps, even as much as you've 
> written so far in these emails would be enough.
> 

I'm not the one proposing the new (potentially wrong) interface. The
onus isn't on me.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/