[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608222023.k7MKNHpH018036@pasta.boston.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:23:17 -0400
From: Ernie Petrides <petrides@...hat.com>
To: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: printk()s of user-supplied strings (Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again)
On Tuesday, 22-Aug-2006 at 7:7 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:36:01PM -0400, Ernie Petrides wrote:
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to load interpreter %.128s\n",
> > - elf_interpreter);
>
> I'd rather have this message rate-limited, not dropped completely.
I consider any printk() that can be arbitrarily triggered by an
unprivileged user to be inappropriate, rate-limited or not. I
recommend that it be removed entirely.
> Another long-time concern that I had is that we've got some printk()s
> of user-supplied string data. What about embedded linefeeds - can this
> be used to produce fake kernel messages with arbitrary log level (syslog
> priority)? It certainly seems so.
>
> Also, there are terminal controls...
These are valid concerns. Allowing the kernel to print user-fabricated
strings is a terrible idea.
Cheers. -ernie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists