[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44EB8B2A.8030603@student.ltu.se>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:54:34 +0200
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Prajakta Gudadhe <pgudadhe@...dia.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Generic booleans in -mm (was: Re: [PATCH] Sgpio support in sata_nv)
Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:17:06 -0700
>Prajakta Gudadhe <pgudadhe@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>
[snip]
>>...
>>
>>+
>>+static bool nv_sgpio_update_led(struct nv_sgpio_led *led, bool *on_off)
>>
>>
>
>Please remove the new private implementation of `bool' and just use `int'.
>There's ongoing discussion about how to do a kernel-wide implementation of
>bool, and adding new driver-private ones now just complicates that.
>
>
Well, the discussion seem to have quiet down (so time to start it up
again ;) ). But would you take a patch for a generic implementation of
bool/false/true? I sent one 29th of July with no complaints or
suggestions. I am happy to send it again.
About this patch, isn't better to leave the 'bool'-type if there is a
will to make a common boolean? Easier to find and convert a local
definition of bool then finding functions who are boolean, but decleard
as some kind of integer.
Just a thought
/Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists