[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060822231129.GA18296@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:11:29 +0400
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
To: Jari Sundell <sundell.software@...il.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Hello!
> >No way - timespec uses long.
>
> I must have missed that discussion. Please enlighten me in what regard
> using an opaque type with lower resolution is preferable to a type
> defined in POSIX for this sort of purpose.
Let me explain, as a person who did this mistake and deeply
regrets about this.
F.e. in this case you just cannot use kevents in 32bit application
on x86_64, unless you add the whole translation layer inside kevent core.
Even when you deal with plain syscall, translation is a big pain,
but when you use mmapped buffer, it can be simply impossible.
F.e. my mistake was "unsigned long" in struct tpacket_hdr in linux/if_packet.h.
It makes use of mmapped packet socket essentially impossible by 32bit
applications on 64bit archs.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists