linux-kernel - Re: Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060822072704.GA632@merlin.emma.line.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:27:05 +0200
From:	Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	greg@...ah.com, bunk@...sta.de, jwboyer@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch

Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am 2006-08-21:

> I beg to remind you why Marcelo was picked, not only for his skills,
> but also because he was so universally friendly, and easy to talk
> with. I couldn't imagine Marcelo wanting to hurt anyone. To me that's
> important, I could never disagree with the Marcelo pick. But this is
> basically the opposite in my view. A maintainer needs qualities that
> go beyond technical skills. I think it's Greg's fault of course, I'm
> not blaming anybody else, but this clearly shows that the tree of
> trust has its limits, hence I'd like a different system to elect the
> new maintainers that has a better chance to work.

I still liked your semi-technical reasons better than the personal.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/