linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608231106.26696.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:06:26 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h

On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:01, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Yes, after discussion with Rusty, it appears that beefing up 
> >> stop_machine_run is the right way to go.  And it has benefits for 
> >> non-paravirt code as well, such as allowing plug-in kprobes or oprofile 
> >> extension modules to be loaded without having to deal with a debug 
> >> exception or NMI during module load/unload.
> >>     
> >
> > I'm still unclear where you think those debug exceptions will come from
> 
> kprobes set in the stop_machine code - which is probably a really bad 
> idea, but nothing today actively stops kprobes from doing that.

kprobes don't cause any debug exceptions. You mean int3?

Anyways this can be fixed by marking the stop machine code __kprobes

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/