[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44EC2600.3070006@argo.co.il>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:55:12 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, pj@....com,
saito.tadashi@...t.fujitsu.com, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ps command race fix take2 [1/4] list token
ebiederm@...ssion.com wrote:
>
> I almost removed the tasklist_lock from all read paths. But as it
> happens sending a signal to a process group is an atomic operation
> with respect to fork so that path has to take the lock, or else
> we get places where "kill -9 -pgrp" fails to kill every process in
> the process group. Which is even worse.
>
Can't that be fixed by adding a per-pgrp lock, and having both
fork()/clone() and kill(-pgrp) take that lock?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists