lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608231735210.9588@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:36:08 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Rich Paredes <rparedes@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMP Affinity and nice

>Subject: SMP Affinity and nice
>
>I am trying to come to an understanding as to why 1 process is getting
>less cpu time than identical processes with a higher "nice" value.
>Server has 2 physical processors with hyperthreading (cpu 0,1,2,3)
>
>I am starting 5 processes that perform a square root loop to max out a
>cpu.  They use the exact same code but are renamed for identification:
>cpumax1, cpumax2, cpumax3, cpumax4, cpumax5
[...]

What you describe should be addressed in the -ck patchset (smpnice-...diff) 
Not sure if it is in mainline already, though.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ