[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <787b0d920608222135g4751ad8v567bf8098e0fb170@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:35:26 -0400
From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com>
To: drepper@...hat.com, nmiell@...cast.net, davem@...emloft.net,
jmorris@...ei.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, zach.brown@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Ulrich Drepper writes:
> I so far also haven't taken the time to look exactly at the
> interface. I plan to do it asap since this is IMO our big chance
> to get it right. I want to have a unifying interface which can
> handle all the different events we need and which come up today
> and tomorrow. We have to be able to handle not only file
> descriptors and AIO but also timers, signals, message queues
> (OK, they are file descriptors but let's make it official),
> futexes. I'm probably missing the one or the other thing now.
Yeah, you're missing one. I must warn you, it's tasteless.
You forgot ptrace events. (everybody now: EEEEEEEW!)
The wait-related functions in general are interesting.
People like to use a general event mechanism to deal with
threads exiting. Seriously, it would really help with
porting code from that other OS.
How about SysV semaphores?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists