[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060823140440.92bc9a10.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:04:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
James Morris <jmorris@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: 3/3 convert sbsec semaphore to a mutex
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:50:37 -0400
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch converts the semaphore in the superblock security struct to a
> mutex. No locking changes or other code changes are done.
>
> This is being targeted for 2.6.19
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 7 +++----
> security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6-sem-changes/security/selinux/include/objsec.h.patch3 2006-08-03 14:04:07.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-sem-changes/security/selinux/include/objsec.h 2006-08-03 14:18:44.000000000 -0400
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct superblock_security_struct {
> unsigned int behavior; /* labeling behavior */
> unsigned char initialized; /* initialization flag */
> unsigned char proc; /* proc fs */
> - struct semaphore sem;
> + struct mutex lock;
> struct list_head isec_head;
> spinlock_t isec_lock;
> };
> --- linux-2.6-sem-changes/security/selinux/hooks.c.patch3 2006-08-02 14:29:28.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-sem-changes/security/selinux/hooks.c 2006-08-03 14:21:48.000000000 -0400
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
> #include <net/ip.h> /* for sysctl_local_port_range[] */
> #include <net/tcp.h> /* struct or_callable used in sock_rcv_skb */
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> -#include <asm/semaphore.h>
> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -240,7 +239,7 @@ static int superblock_alloc_security(str
> if (!sbsec)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - init_MUTEX(&sbsec->sem);
> + mutex_init(&sbsec->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbsec->list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbsec->isec_head);
> spin_lock_init(&sbsec->isec_lock);
> @@ -595,7 +594,7 @@ static int superblock_doinit(struct supe
> struct inode *inode = root->d_inode;
> int rc = 0;
>
> - down(&sbsec->sem);
> + mutex_lock(&sbsec->lock);
> if (sbsec->initialized)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -690,7 +689,7 @@ next_inode:
> }
> spin_unlock(&sbsec->isec_lock);
> out:
> - up(&sbsec->sem);
> + mutex_unlock(&sbsec->lock);
> return rc;
> }
>
>
Does this lock actually do anything?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists