[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060824090455.GA18202@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:04:55 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@...oo.fr>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [HELP] Power management for embedded system
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:44:25AM +0000, moreau francis wrote:
> Mips one seems to be a copy and paste of arm one and both of them
> have removed all APM bios stuff orginally part of i386 implementation.
The BIOS stuff makes no sense on ARM - there isn't a BIOS to do anything
with.
> It doesn't seem that APM is something really stable and finished.
It's complete. It's purpose is to provide the interface to userland so
that programs know about suspend/resume events, and can initiate suspends.
Eg, the X server.
The power management really comes from the Linux drivers themselves,
which are written to peripherals off when they're not in use. The other
power saving comes from things like cpufreq - again, nothing to do with
the magical "APM" or "ACPI" terms.
On embedded platforms, you shouldn't think about power management in
terms of the non-embedded PM technologies.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists