[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1156383086.8324.39.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:31:26 -0700
From: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: sekharan@...ibm.com, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
hugh@...itas.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 11:02 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-08-21 am 18:45 -0700, ysgrifennodd Rohit Seth:
> > I think as the tasks move around, it becomes very heavy to move all the
> > pages belonging to previous container to a new container.
>
> Its not a meaningful thing to do. Remember an object may be passed
> around or shared. The simple "creator pays" model avoids all the heavy
> overheads while maintaining the constraints.
>
I agree, creator pays model will be good for anonymous pages. (And this
is where page based container will help).
> Its only user space pages that some of this (AS and RSS) become
> interesting as "movable" objects
>
I think something like for AS, yes. But for anonymous pages, might want
to leave them back.
-rohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists